Judge Refuses To Dismiss Netflix ‘Baby Reindeer’ Case And Issues Judgement

Buy Me A Coffee

Netflix’s week in court went about as well as trying to watch a movie on dial-up internet—slow, painful, and full of buffering. Their attempts to kick a $170 million defamation suit to the curb got a big, fat “nope” from the judge. So, what’s this all about? Well, back in June, Netflix was slapped with a lawsuit by one Fiona Harvey, who’s madder than a hornet because she claims the character Martha, played by Jessica Gunning in Baby Reindeer, is basically a carbon copy of her. And not the flattering kind either. She’s alleging defamation like she found a cockroach in her cereal.

In their defense, Netflix swore up and down they weren’t even talking about her and tried to get the case tossed faster than a bad sequel. But U.S. District Judge R. Gary Klausner wasn’t buying their popcorn. He straight-up rejected their argument like a bouncer turning away a guy with no shoes at the club.

See also  Kelly Clarkson Settles Lawsuit With Ex Brandon Blackstock

Let’s break down the legal mumbo-jumbo: Netflix tried to convince the court that “nobody would possibly think Martha is Fiona Harvey because the similarities are way too broad.” You know, like how any Scottish lawyer living in London who’s been accused of stalking and had awkward social media convos with the same guy could’ve been the inspiration? But Judge Klausner was like, “Nah, fam, that’s a bit too specific.”

See also  Kenya Moore Leaves 'The Real Housewives Of Atlanta' Following Suspension

In his court documents, he basically said, “Look, Netflix, this isn’t one of those ‘this could be anyone’ situations. Martha and Fiona are practically twins, except for the part where one’s on TV and the other is suing your pants off. Both are Scottish lawyers, same age, living in London, accused of stalking in a newspaper article, and both have a weird social media thing with Gadd/Donny. I mean, come on! This is not ‘just a coincidence’ territory anymore.”

See also  Amanda Seyfried Is Solving Crimes and Taking Names in Peacock’s New Thriller Long Bright River!

Now, don’t get too excited if you’re Team Fiona, because the judge did swipe a couple of her claims off the table. She won’t be getting damages for negligence or a shiny ‘right of publicity’ award. And punitive damages? Yeah, those are out too. Sorry, Fiona, no extra sprinkles on this sundae.

If Netflix and Fiona don’t hug it out and settle before then, the case is headed to trial on May 6, 2025. Get your popcorn ready, this drama might be even juicier than what’s on Netflix! Stay tuned for updates, because who knows? Maybe they’ll adapt this into a show next!

Comments area

Sidebar

Must Read

Ozzy Osbourne Reveals What He’s “PIssed Off” At Amid Health Struggles

Ozzy Osbourne, 74-year-young maestro of chaos, is spilling the...

Lady Gaga Tributes Tony Bennett One Year After His Death

Lady Gaga is taking a moment to remember the...

Chappell Roan Calls Out Billboard for Being, Well, A Little Nosy

Chappell Roan, our girl behind the banger HOT TO...

Ashley Tisdale And Husband Christopher French Welcome Their Second Child

Ashley Tisdale just dropped some massive news—she’s officially a...

Matthew McConaughey Shows Off His Swollen Face After Getting Stung By A Bee

Matthew McConaughey recently had a rather *bee-lievable* encounter that...

Khloe Kardashian And Scott Disick Spotted Shopping For Cars Together

Khloe Kardashian, our favorite reality TV star and co-owner...

You Might Also Like

Why Justin Bieber Partied Alone on Halloween Without Hailey Bieber

Justin Bieber, 29, was like a lone wolf howling...

Chappell Roan Cancels And Reschedules Select Tour Dates

Chappell Roan is playing tour-date Tetris, and it’s getting...

Lindsay Lohan Just Can’t Escape Elaine Hendrix—And We Love It!

Lindsay Lohan’s Parent Trap nemesis, Elaine Hendrix, just snuck...

Selena Gomez Debuts New Hairstyle

Guess what? Selena Gomez, 31-year-old "Single Soon" sensation, just...